Notes From the Road
A few brief episodes looking back at a long road trip to different parts of the United States. The trip, which forced my wife and I to miss what people widely agree is the most beautiful Yom Tov in Israel, was necessitated by a combination of professional and personal interests. The latter aimed to avoid certain legal problems. Namely, we had a bunch of kids who were planning a class-action lawsuit against us, alleging abandonment (for leaving them behind when we moved to Yerushalayim).
- Israeli taxi-drivers continue to be a font of wisdom and inspiration. I used to think that only tourists felt that way. Now that I live there, I can vouch for continuing to find them sometimes inspirational, sometimes just reservoirs of uncommon common-sense. In Norfolk, Virginia, I learned that Israelis don’t have a monopoly on vehicle operators who can toss off the pithy comment that nails it. My purpose in passing through Norfolk was to serve as a scholar-in-residence role at B’nai Israel, the local Orthodox shul thriving under the stewardship of R. Sender Haber. Once there, however, I knew that I had to contact Gordon Robertson, the genius behind the Christian Broadcasting Network, and a friend of Israel who has contributed immeasurably for decades to presenting a picture of Israel to millions of people very different from CNN, MSNBC, and the NYT. That meant an early-morning appearance for the live broadcast of the famous 700 Club television program. Guests on the show are treated royally, and they provided a van and driver to take me to visit the local day school after the program.
I made a point of opening a conversation with the van driver, a late middle-age African-American woman. (Evangelicals are roundly criticized in the media hostile to them as being a white male enterprise. After arriving at the studio, I passed through many doors before going on camera. It was a full 45 minutes before I met the first white person. I can’t weigh in on all the security people, but those involved in the actual production – with whom I interacted much more – were all evangelicals themselves.) I asked her if she had to drive around boring people like me, or whether she got to transport some real celebrities. Without the briefest hesitation, she replied:
“Rabbi – if a person fears G-d, then he is a celebrity in my eyes. And if he doesn’t, I don’t care what he does. He’s no celebrity.”
(I found the community thoroughly delightful – a rich mixture of many seasoned FFB bnei Torah, and a greater number of serious, long-term baalei teshuvah. The visit afforded me an opportunity to encounter the unexpectedly full assortment of Torah institutions: a day school in frum hands, boys’ high school and yeshiva, girls’ high school, chesed organizations. It seemed to me to be a community that is underappreciated as a place that should attract young couples wishing to escape the congestion and pressures to conform of the Tri-State area without compromising the chinuch of children. Virginia is a voucher state, so chinuch is affordable, while housing is reasonable.)
- My youngest son is one of the founding members of the kollel that opened in Berlin a year ago, serving a diverse community, the largest component thereof consisting of émigrés from the old Soviet Union who arrived decades ago and never managed to move on. The Berliners are the lucky ones, because they have access to a range of Torah services. One fellow who lives in Nuremberg used to order his four minim from the local merchant in Berlin. Last year’s lulav arrived damaged in the course of shipping. So this year, he got on a bus and travelled eight hours to participate in the one-day “esrog market” at a Berlin shul. It did not take long for him to make his selection, at which point he turned around, and took an eight hour bus ride back. It is hard not to stand in awe of such unsung commitment.
- The Yom Kippur daytime drashah at Ohr HaTorah, a very large kiruv– and community-oriented charedi shul in Dallas offered a story that few expected to hear, and was remarkable for its courage. It was delivered by the assistant rabbi, Rabbi Ezra Sarna, who told of the time he and some Ner Israel talmidim were gathered around R. Shragi Neuberger’s table. A call came in, which the rebbi felt compelled to take. The talmidim could only hear R. Neuberger, but not the voice at the other end. “No, you don’t. [Pause] It is not a mitzvah. [Pause] Gehinom? I would pay to get such a gehinom!” The talmidim were naturally curious about what they were missing, and R. Neuberger agreed to share the other half of the conversation. “A woman called. Some of her ribs were broken. She wanted to know if she was supposed to be mochel / forgive her husband. I told her definitely not. She persisted – isn’t it a special mitzvah, close to Yom Kippur, a segulah that Hashem should forgive us for all our wrongdoing? It told her that it would be no mitzvah at all. She wouldn’t relent. He asked for forgiveness. If I deny it to him, doesn’t it put me in danger of winding up in Gehinom. I told her that I would gladly acquire such a Gehinom.
If we had more people like R. Neuberger, we’d be ahead of the curve in addressing the problem of domestic abuse.
End of stories. It’s great to be back home.
“A woman called. Some of her ribs were broken. She wanted to know if she was supposed to be mochel / forgive her husband. I told her definitely not. She persisted – isn’t it a special mitzvah, close to Yom Kippur, a segulah that Hashem should forgive us for all our wrongdoing? It told her that it would be no mitzvah at all.
I’m guessing there’s more to the story and that R’ SN felt that her not being mochel would have an impact on her husband’s actions. If not I would have guessed she would have been told to leave him? FWIW IIRC the only exception to the forgiveness rule is motzi shem ra (spreading negatively about the individual)
So was Rabbi Adlerstein’s visit and interview with that Christian Network broadcast, and if so, will it be available on youTube? I actually have watched such an interview of Rabbi Daniel Lapin on the 700 club which was surreal enough; how much moreso would be such an experience in this case. Maybe all of us reading this can watch it, and then make comments about it on this website. 🙂
They love us mainly as potential converts. They assume that conversion would improve us.
Not in my experience. Chief reason is that they take Bereishis 12:3 quite seriously. They certainly would not mind our conversion, just as we would not mind their dropping the Trinity.
No mention of Mr. Shawarma in Norfolk? We were passing through the area this summer and that place was a life saver. You know that a kosher place is awesome if it is both packed and without any significant discernible presence of observant Jews.
I ate there three times. I did find it semi-miraculous that there could be a thriving frum community w/o a pizza shop. Mr.Shawarma has to be part of the reason why this is possible
WHAT??? The reaction of the Rabbi to the story of the battered woman is completely wrong! A woman calling about a husband who broke her ribs is a safek Pikuach Nefesh at a minimum. He should have immediately left the Talmidim or sent them away and inquired into the woman’s situation. She and her kids could be in danger. Given the question, she could be living under the presumption that halacha requires her to stay in an abusive marriage. She could feel that the doesn’t have the money to leave or won’t get the support of the community or Rabbis around her if she didn’t. For all the Rabbi knows, the women is reaching out in a cry for help looking to see if anyone cares. Simply answering the Shayla and hanging up is a horrific reponse. I’m very surprised and disappointed that Rabbi Sarna would endorse such a reaction and that (with due respect) Rabbi Adlerstein would endorse this as well. [Note: my reaction refers to the endorsement of the story by the two Rabbis. I’m not commenting on the Rabbi quoted in the story since we don’t have direct knowledge of the story.]
Since “we don’t have direct knowledge of the story” why would you even entertain the possibility that his reaction was anything but what it undoubtedly was: a follow-up conversation well after the violent incident, which he certainly would have reacted to with primary concern for the safety of the woman and her children? Interesting that in a room full of a few hundred men and women, no one reacted the way you did
Please view the following video on Torah Anytime. It is an alternative view of the massacre in Pittsburgh
Toeiva in Pittsburgh
The website seems to have taken the offensive presentation down. If it was what I can guess it was, a very good Torah response was given by R Moshe Weinberger.
Evangelicals should not make any Shomer Torah Umitzvos who is not among the Ketanei Emunah nervous. Their beliefs OTOH make those who are ketanei emunah and many of our brethren who view separation of church and state as an essential element of what it means to be Jewish quite nervous because public expressions of faith, regardless of whether by Evangelicals or by anyone engaged in Kiruv push their emotional buttons and generate a lack of tolerance for someone whose life is motivated and directed by religious belief and practices.
One or our neighbors’ parents moved from LI to Norfolk and spent Shabbos at our house for a family simcha. When we met and shmoozed with them, we received a similarly impressive report as R Adlerstein as to the extent of Torah observant life in Norfolk.
Or – having sat many times in R. Shargi Neuberger’s dining room when such calls came in – he may have answered the call strictly on her own words, while knowing full well the story might not be accurate, the caller might not be well, or something completely different. Point is, R. Shragi is a wise man, with much life experience, and knows not to overact as the commenter here would. There are many rabbis who will tell you how much they regret believing such calls (usually, but not always, from women) and getting involved in domestic squabbles, only to find out they had been used, misled, or otherwise made to look foolish.