News and Essays In and Out of Orthodoxy – Parshas Pinchas 5776

You may also like...

10 Responses

  1. Reading says:

    Re “Senator Kaine Elicits Mixed Review From Jewish Voices” – a significant portion of the part praising Kaine is based on a Hasidic PR guy that is also a lobbyist, who is intimately connected to the Democrat party, which makes him have a vested interest in promoting that liberal political machine. His personal and business interests should not be confused with those of the Jewish community, however. Kaine is evidently a very skilled and clever politician. But some nice words uttered at a feel-good event alone, without proportional corresponding acts, don’t get a politician immediate acceptance into the hall of fame in our faith.

    Just to bring some much needed balance into the picture, we should also be aware that the same Senator Kaine, with Ezra Friedlander, just honored, in the US Senate in DC, five times married serial philanderer and walking chillul Hashem ‘Rabbi’ Marc Schneier, someone who was, not long ago, in a very rare action, expelled by the Rabbinical Council of America, for egregious, immoral, and vile behavior. Yet, in this video, from just about two months ago, he is lavishly praised and honored by Senator Kaine together with Mr. Friedlander. That should make you realize how much credence to give to such PR rhetoric.

  2. Eli Blum says:

    I had never heard the “syndrome K” story, thank you for sharing.

  3. dr. bill says:

    It is refreshing to hear the honesty of rabbi Hefter, who is forthright in saying he doesn’t think the the Rav ztl and RAL ztl would agree with him. (it is worth noting that one of the 3 current RY serving in RAL and rav Amital ztl’s position attended the semicha ceremony.)  Compare that to Rabbi Meiselman trying to present his views in the Rav’s aura.  More importantly, he correctly noted the independence both the Rav and RAL promoted in their students even in quasi-halakhic matters.  Gedolai Olam of previous generations held similar views.

    • mycroft says:

      Dr Bill

      i have similar views-I have no problem with anyone disagreeing with the RAv even good students from his shiur. Just be open that you disagree with his viewpoints. If the RAv acted in a way contrary to your desire don’t say he had a different way or the old saying from decades ago from a leading RAv from Bennett Ave about SRH -his ideas were a horas shah. There is no indication anywhere about that. Of course, similar ideas have spread about the RAv indicating Boston was a special case-no evidence of that, or the RAv didn’t believe what he did.

      even more a different Rabbi not living in Manhattan states that there were only 6 shower Shabbos Jews in Boston when the RAv came to Boston-laughable on its face.

      • mycroft says:

        The issue of changing what we did or what we did is not valid is one that once you open up the door on either side becomes to I believe roughly quote Joel Rich who has the power to decide. Thus, it is then no longer a questin f following menorah ish mini ish but following who one believes is appropriate some may choose to follow RY X or Y or Rabbi Z-but it then becomes ones choice.if it is OK to change on the right it is OK to changs on the left. Then it becomes who one trusts based on integrity, based on logic and based even on ability to remember viewpoints

        • joel rich says:

          yup and the final psak of history will be based on a number of factors not the least of which is what a substantial subgroup will accept.   Interesting is R’ AL’s position concerning the humility and introspection needed in major psak decisions (as well as the specifics on this issue)  See “Seeking His Presence” on this

          She-nir’eh et nehamat Yerushalayim u-binyanah bi-mherah ve-yamenu,

    • Steve brizel says:

      Obviously the curriculum makes YCTs look strenuous and can be fairly described as “about Judaism” and some courses that are heavy on hashkafa and almost nonexistent on Gemara and Halacha.

    • Steve brizel says:

      Perhaps the educated reader who is a yodea sefer could decide whether the three volumes of Harei Kedem or R Hefter is more or a less a talmid of the Torah of RYBS. The faculty at the school described contains at least one member whose views RAL viewed as highly problematical on issues of gender based on her gender based views of Chazal

       

  4. Weaver says:

    “Some people would say that that’s (studying other religions) studying heresy.”

    It would seem to depend on what parts of the religions you’re studying. There are plenty of concepts and ideas from other religions that are not heresy. (The Abarbanel even incorporated explanations from Christian thinkers into his peirush on Chumash.)

    I would agree that there are definite risks in exploring other religions, though.

  5. david z says:

    I don’t understand why you’re promoting the fallacy that the dnc emails were anti Jewish. They were pro Jewish. They were anti atheist. Which I thought was beautiful. He’s saying even his southern Baptist west Virginians and kentuckians would be absolutely give with a God fearing Jew. But not with an atheist. He was calling into question Sanders responding he’s ethically Jewish to the question of religion. Just as it might be nonsensical for someone to respond hey I’m Irish when they ask if he believes in God.

Pin It on Pinterest