Play to Win

You may also like...

4 Responses

  1. Feivel says:

    An eccentric philosophy professor gave a one question final exam after a semester dealing with a broad array of topics.

    The class was already seated and ready to go when the professor picked up his chair, plopped it on his desk and wrote on the board: “Using everything we have learned this semester, prove that this chair does not exist.”

    Fingers flew, erasers erased, notebooks were filled in furious fashion. Some students wrote over 30 pages in one hour attempting to refute the existence of the chair. One member of the class however, was up and finished in less than a minute.

    Weeks later when the grades were posted, the rest of the group wondered how he could have gotten an A when he had barely written anything at all.

    His answer consisted of two words: “What chair?”

  2. Lisa says:

    I’m not sure who your correspondent is, but what of someone to whom that level of conceptualization is relatively easy to achieve? It isn’t a matter of smarter vs. duller or educated vs. ignorant. We each see the world in different ways. Art of all kinds makes that clear.

    There are genres of literature, such as science fiction, that train the mind to be able to consider ideas that the average person would dismiss as silly. It’s no coincidence that the most strongly theological film in decades, The Matrix (which you alluded to in your article), was a science fiction movie.

    There have been times in history when the average person was comfortable with simple answers to questions about Hashem and reality. But today, when people’s minds have been stimulated — for good or for ill — by literature, television, movies and the like, and when people are up for the challenge of looking at more than just the surface, I think we are making a huge mistake to insist on teaching only surface concepts. It makes us look primitive, and it prevents young people from seeing the tremendous wealth of thought that exists in Judaism.

    When I was 12, I read a book called “The Werewolf Principle”. It was a science fiction novel, and I remember very little about it. One image that stuck in my mind, though, was of the protaganist in a house. The house was empty. It was uniformly grey with no doors or windows or distinguishing marks whatsoever. And at some signal, the house began to “extrude” furniture, wallpaper, pictures, doors, windows… until it looked like a regular house. the reality was, however, that none of the things the protaganist saw in the house were real. They were manifestations of the house itself. Nothing was actually there *except* the house.

    When I described this scene to a rav I once had as a teacher (in my late 30s), he was extremely impressed by the imagery, and felt that it was a clever way to analogize certain Jewish concepts relating to Hashem and reality. Concepts he didn’t think his students were up to comprehending.

  3. Mike Fisher says:

    Yaakov Menken’s point that we are living in a “Virtual Reality Simulator” reminds me also of the movie, The Truman Show which is about a person who is living in a “Virtual Reality Simulator” and who finally begins to realize this and tries to escape. I think this movie is very appropriate for a rational thinking person who either struggles with this concept or is not even aware of this concept. This movie made me more aware than ever that we are definitely living in Hashem’s “Virtual Reality Simulator” however we cannot escape until our ultimate death where we then enter Olam Habah- the real world. Furthermore, you may want to point this out to your Correspondent as a simple thought. Just look no further than a technology that most of us take for granted- The digital camcorder.

    If we can go around and easily film anyone or anything today, surely G-d in heaven is “filming” our every move and will be playing it back to us one day. If that doesnt scare a person to recognize G-d, I don’t know what else will.

  4. Scott Bryan says:

    I suppose the problem for me is that in each of the VR alternatives, one is left wondering why our minds themselves need a physical brain to exist in a vat or wired to some device while apparently everything else can be perfectly simulated. Especially when you consider that of all the things we know of, our minds alone seem to have the least intrinsic need for any particular enabling physical apparatus.

    Perhaps Olam HaSheker illuminates something much simpler. A heuristic reminding us that the word we inhabit is indeed a virtual one of our making that exists only in our own minds. The physical world simply cannot be experienced directly, only the representation we create for it inside our minds.

Pin It on Pinterest